Darth Krayt vs Mace Windu

LadyKulvax wrote:An author clarifying the intent and meaning behind something they have written is absolutely valid as it trumps any and all other views on any given matter. Unless hard-contradicted in other material. That's entirely different from them stating their opinions in general.

the material doesnt even support it though, we never see Muur being that powerful by himslef

That's nonsensical. Even if you right, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. But you're not so it doesn't matter.

Krayt ragdolls the exiles and then all of them gets ragdolled by Windu.

LadyKulvax wrote:That's nonsensical. Even if you right, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. But you're not so it doesn't matter.

at the end of the day there is no evidence aside from an author quote that implies that Muur is that strong by himself

"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" while true on a technical level(it's impossible to prove a negative). is a hollow rebuttal at the practical level. We can still use absence of evidence, depending on the sample size, to assert the probability of said evidence existing is extremely low. So low that the idea of said evidence existing isn't even worth considering seriously. For instance in humanity's history, no one has ever found definitive proof of the existence of the unicorn. One would reason that for billions upon billions of humans to have never been able to cough up proof, it's extremely unlikely unicorns exist. Sure, there's always that chance that unicorns have successfully eluded humanity's effort to obtain evidence of their existence for millennia, but the probability is so low that it isn't even worth mentioning. For all intents and purposes, unicorns don't exist. To bring this back to SW, it is rare, if not impossible, for absolute, indisputable evidence for a case to exist in this fictional universe. Subjectivity, ambiguity, uncertainty. These exist in most forms of evidence available to us. So to dismiss someone pointing out the lack of evidence for a case on the basis that that reasoning cannot definitively disprove your hypothesis, comparison, or scaling chain, is tantamount to dismissing 95% of the evidence we have available to us. The lesson for you guys is; don't go spamming 'absence of evidence is not evidence of absence' like you're some logical savant. You'll find in most of the instances where it's used, it's generally a hollow defence.

That'd be at least somewhat valid if Vaelias's counter to what's said in numerous quotes wasn't that Muur hasn't (he has) displayed power adequate enough for the statements to be true.

It’s still feasible for Krayt to beat Windu

No it isn’t. It’s not even feasible for Krayt to take Tsui Choi

We’ll see about that...

Ok mouse

LadyKulvax wrote:That'd be at least somewhat valid if Vaelias's counter to what's said in numerous quotes wasn't that Muur hasn't (he has) displayed power adequate enough for the statements to be true.

I only said that there is no evidence of it and then you basically just said no lol, the only thing supporting your claim is a non canon author quote, show me one time where spirit Muur as displayed this power by himself without Morne, that's all you needed to do, but if i recall correctly, that never happens

You don't get to decide what is usable or not on a forum. Ostrander's authority as the writer of the source material in question is absolutely valid. You're claiming he never showed that power, when in actually he very clearly could have been using solely his own power in any given showing. Your argument is moot. Muur is obviously > vong Krayt.

LadyKulvax wrote:You don't get to decide what is usable or not on a forum. Ostrander's authority as the writer of the source material in question is absolutely valid. You're claiming he never showed that power, when in actually he very clearly could have been using solely his own power in any given showing. Your argument is moot. Muur is obviously > vong Krayt.

its not me claiming to decide that lol, its a non canon author quote that your basing this off, they about as reliable as blurbs lol.

Krayt reinstitutes the Jim Crow laws